Mon Oct 06 22:31:05 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

The Trump administration is continuing its practice of deporting individuals to “third-country” nations where they have no ties, despite human rights concerns. A second flight of deportees, none of whom are citizens of Eswatini, was recently sent to the African nation. The White House claims those deported committed serious crimes. Rights groups and lawyers are condemning the practice, citing lack of due process, inaccessibility to legal counsel, and potential for individuals to be stranded. Activists in Eswatini are also protesting the agreement between their government and the U.S.

**News Article:**

**Trump Administration Faces Backlash Over “Third-Country” Deportations to Eswatini**

MBABANE, ESWATINI – The Trump administration is facing renewed criticism over its deportation policies after sending a second group of individuals to Eswatini, a small African nation, none of whom are citizens of that country. Ten deportees arrived in Eswatini this week, following a previous flight of five in July.

The White House defended the move, stating the individuals were convicted of “heinous crimes.” However, immigration lawyers and human rights groups are raising serious concerns about the legality and ethics of the practice, which they say deprives deportees of due process and leaves them stranded in unfamiliar and potentially dangerous circumstances.

Attorney Tin Thanh Nguyen, representing some of the deportees, reported that he has been unable to communicate with his clients and that the Eswatini government is blocking access to legal counsel. “I cannot call them. I cannot email them… the Eswatini government blocks all attorney access,” he stated.

This “third-country” deportation practice, increasingly utilized by the Trump administration, involves sending individuals to countries other than their nation of origin when legal obstacles prevent direct deportation. Past recipients of such deportations include South Sudan, Ghana, and Rwanda.

Critics argue that the practice violates international law and basic human rights, leaving individuals in a legal limbo with no support network. Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, asserted that the deportees sent to Eswatini “do not belong in the United States.”

Activists in Eswatini have also condemned the secret agreement between their government and the U.S., launching a legal challenge to halt future deportations. While the Eswatini Department of Correctional Services maintains its commitment to humane treatment, the deportations continue to spark controversy both in the U.S. and abroad. The long-term fate and repatriation of these individuals remain uncertain.

Read More