Mon Oct 06 12:07:15 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and rewritten news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

Madras High Court Justice N. Senthilkumar addressed the issue of social media trolling during a hearing for a defamation case involving a chef and a costume designer. He revealed he and his family faced online harassment after ordering a probe into a deadly stampede at a political rally. Despite the negativity, Justice Senthilkumar emphasized the importance of ignoring such attacks, especially for those in the public eye. He refused to issue an interim order against the defendant in the defamation case without allowing her to respond, showcasing a commitment to due process. The Bar Council of India expressed its support for the judge in light of the online abuse.

**News Article:**

**Madras High Court Judge Addresses Social Media Trolling, Remains Resilient**

**CHENNAI, October 6, 2025** – Justice N. Senthilkumar of the Madras High Court publicly addressed the rising issue of social media trolling, revealing that he and his family have been subjected to online harassment following his recent decision to form a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate a tragic stampede in Karur that claimed 41 lives. The judge made the remarks during a hearing for a civil suit involving chef Madhampatty T. Rangaraj and costume designer Joy Crizildaa.

The case centers on alleged defamatory statements made by Ms. Crizildaa against Mr. Rangaraj on social media. During the hearing, Justice Senthilkumar acknowledged the pervasiveness of online abuse, stating, “Even judges are trolled day in and day out.” He then alluded to the personal attacks he’d faced after his October 3rd verdict concerning the Karur tragedy.

“Just because others have a divergent view, our family members are pulled in…and they start painting colours to a judge,” he stated, adding, “These things do happen, but why should we take a serious note of all these things? In fact, we should just smile and ignore them.”

Despite the pressures, Justice Senthilkumar demonstrated his commitment to impartiality by refusing to issue any interim order against Ms. Crizildaa without giving her an opportunity to file a response.

Senior Counsel S. Prabakaran, Vice-Chairman of the Bar Council of India, assured Justice Senthilkumar of the Bar’s full support, urging him not to be discouraged by the online attacks. The judge acknowledged the support, reiterating his intention to remain unfazed by the negativity. The case is scheduled for further hearing on October 22.

The incident highlights the growing concern over online harassment and its potential impact on the judiciary.

Read More