Sat Oct 04 06:39:33 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text, followed by a news article formatted from it:

**Summary:**

The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to Sajid Chaudhary, a Meerut resident accused of sharing a pro-Pakistan post on social media. He was charged under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which deals with endangering India’s sovereignty. The court ruled that while the post might incite disharmony, it didn’t meet the threshold for a Section 152 charge. The court also noted the newness of the provision and cautioned against its casual use. The defense argued the accused was falsely implicated and merely forwarded the post. The prosecution claimed the accused was a separatist, but presented no evidence.

**News Article:**

**Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Pro-Pakistan Social Media Post Case**

**Prayagraj, October 4, 2025:** The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to Sajid Chaudhary, a resident of Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, who was arrested for allegedly sharing a social media post praising Pakistan. Mr. Chaudhary had been in custody since May 13, 2025, under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), a provision concerning acts endangering India’s sovereignty.

The controversial post reportedly read: “Kamran Bhatti Proud of You, Pakistan Zindabad.”

Justice Santosh Rai, in granting bail, stated that while the post might be seen as provocative and potentially capable of inciting disharmony, it did not meet the stringent requirements for a charge under Section 152 of the BNS. The judge suggested a charge under Section 196 (promoting enmity) might have been more appropriate.

Defense counsel argued that Mr. Chaudhary was falsely accused and had merely forwarded the post, not creating or distributing it. They also emphasized the absence of any prior criminal record and argued that he was unlikely to tamper with evidence if released.

The government counsel opposed the bail, labeling Mr. Chaudhary a separatist and claiming previous involvement in similar activities. However, the court noted that the prosecution failed to provide any concrete evidence to support the claim that the accused had made statements against the integrity and sovereignty of India.

The court further highlighted that Section 152 of the BNS is a newly introduced provision, with no direct equivalent in the previous Indian Penal Code (IPC), and urged its use with caution and due diligence.

Read More