Wed Sep 24 22:20:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

The High Court of Karnataka has rejected a petition filed by X Corp (formerly Twitter), challenging takedown orders issued by Indian authorities under Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act. The court emphasized that social media platforms like X cannot operate in a state of “anarchic freedom” and must be held accountable for the content they host, especially concerning offenses against women. The court highlighted that all forms of communication, including social media, have always been subject to regulation, and that India’s approach is in line with global practices, including the United States. It also dismissed X Corp’s challenge to the “Sahyog portal,” which facilitates takedown orders. The court also noted the X corp follows takedown orders in the United States of America, but refuses to follow the same in India. The ruling underscores the importance of balancing free speech with responsibility and ensuring the safety and dignity of citizens in the online space.

**News Article:**

**Indian Court Upholds Government’s Authority to Order Content Takedowns on X**

**BENGALURU, September 24, 2025** – The High Court of Karnataka has ruled against X Corp (formerly Twitter), affirming the Indian government’s power to issue takedown orders for content deemed unlawful under the Information Technology (IT) Act. The decision, delivered Wednesday, September 24th, rejects X Corp’s challenge to orders issued by Central and State authorities, marking a significant development in the ongoing debate over social media regulation in India.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna stated that social media platforms cannot operate in a regulatory vacuum, especially concerning content that threatens the safety and dignity of citizens, particularly women. “Content on social media must be regulated, particularly in cases of offences against women, failing which the right to dignity of citizens is undermined,” the Judge said.

The court emphasized that all forms of communication, from traditional messengers to modern social media platforms, have been subject to regulation throughout history. It rejected the notion that India’s regulatory approach is unique or unlawful, pointing out that the United States, X Corp’s birthplace, also regulates social media content. The Judge also noted that X corp follows takedown orders in the United States of America, but refuses to follow the same in India.

The court further upheld the validity of the “Sahyog portal,” a platform designed to facilitate cooperation between government agencies and social media intermediaries in addressing cybercrime.

X Corp had argued that the takedown orders violated the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Shreya Singhal case, but the High Court dismissed this claim. The central government argued successfully that Section 79 of the IT Act balances the interests of various stakeholders.

The ruling underscores the Indian government’s commitment to balancing free speech with the need to maintain order and protect its citizens from harmful content online. The decision may set a precedent for future legal challenges to social media regulations in India.

Read More