Tue Sep 23 16:15:08 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the provided text followed by a news article rewrite:

**Summary:**

The Hindu newspaper published on September 23, 2025, reports that CITU general secretary M. Balasubramaniam announced a tripartite meeting to resolve the termination of 23 Madurai Corporation conservancy workers by a contract company. The meeting, involving Minister P. Moorthy, workers, and the company, is scheduled for September 27th. Despite the Minister’s intervention and request for reinstatement and salary repayment, the company allegedly threatened the workers. A planned protest was called off due to the presence of Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin. The text also lists other regular newsletter features of The Hindu.

**News Article:**

**Madurai Corporation Workers’ Termination Sparks Intervention, Tripartite Meeting Scheduled**

**MADURAI, September 23, 2025 (The Hindu) –** A dispute over the termination of 23 conservancy workers employed by a contract company for the Madurai Corporation has prompted intervention from Minister for Commercial Taxes and Registration, P. Moorthy. CITU general secretary M. Balasubramaniam announced today that a tripartite meeting will be held on September 27th, bringing together the Minister, the affected workers, and representatives of the contract company.

The move comes after the CITU condemned the terminations and sought the Minister’s assistance. Mr. Balasubramaniam stated that Minister Moorthy had contacted the contract company and requested the reinstatement of the workers and repayment of deducted salaries. However, the company is alleged to have retaliated by threatening the workers for seeking external help.

A planned protest by the workers was reportedly called off at the request of the Minister due to the presence of Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin in the city. The upcoming tripartite meeting aims to find a resolution to the ongoing labor dispute. This story is developing and The Hindu will continue to provide updates.

**(Note: The article mentions other features of *The Hindu* that weren’t relevant to the core news event and are not included in the rewritten article.)**

Read More