Wed Sep 24 15:39:35 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary of the text and a rewritten version as a news article:
**Summary:**
Popular chef and actor Madhampatty Rangaraj has filed a civil suit against costume designer Joy Crizildaa, who claims to be his wife, seeking to restrain her from making defamatory statements about him on social media. Rangaraj alleges that Crizildaa’s posts damage his reputation and personality rights. He has also filed an application to have her remove the allegedly defamatory content. Additionally, Rangaraj’s catering company, Madhampatty Thangavelu Hospitality Private Limited, is pursuing a separate action against Crizildaa for disparaging their trademark and causing significant financial losses due to cancelled contracts. The court has reserved its orders on the company’s application and will hear Rangaraj’s individual suit at a later date. Crizildaa claims the lawsuit is a commercial attempt to undermine a criminal complaint she has filed against Rangaraj and states that she is fighting for justice and her unborn child.
**News Article:**
**Celebrity Chef Madhampatty Rangaraj Sues Costume Designer Over Defamatory Social Media Posts**
**CHENNAI, September 24, 2025** – Renowned chef and actor Madhampatty Rangaraj has filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court against costume designer Joy Crizildaa, seeking to prevent her from making allegedly false and defamatory statements about him on social media. Rangaraj claims Crizildaa’s posts are damaging to his reputation and personality rights.
The suit, presented before Justice N. Senthilkumar, aims to restrain Crizildaa, who identifies herself as Rangaraj’s wife, from publishing any content that could directly or indirectly defame his character, personal life, or professional standing. Rangaraj has also requested the court to order Crizildaa to remove specific posts from her Instagram account and detag him from her social media activity.
Adding another layer to the legal battle, Madhampatty Thangavelu Hospitality Private Limited, Rangaraj’s catering company, has also filed an application against Crizildaa, alleging that her posts disparaging their unregistered trademark ‘Madhampatty Pakashala’ have resulted in a staggering loss of ₹12 crore due to cancelled contracts.
Senior Counsel P.S. Raman, representing the catering company, argued that the social media posts were the sole reason for the cancellation of contracts. However, Crizildaa’s counsel, S. Prabakaran, challenged the company to provide concrete evidence linking the cancellations directly to his client’s posts.
Crizildaa, in her defense, stated, “I am fighting for justice and for the unborn child in my womb. I have lodged a criminal complaint against Mr. Rangaraj. This suit has been filed only to give a commercial color to the criminal case.”
Justice Senthilkumar has reserved his orders on the catering company’s application to restrain Crizildaa from disparaging their trademark. Rangaraj’s individual suit is expected to be heard at a later date. The case highlights the increasing intersection of personal disputes, social media, and celebrity reputation in the digital age.
First Piper 