Thu Sep 18 16:03:29 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary of the text and a rewrite as a news article, focusing on clarity and conciseness:

**Summary:**

The Supreme Court of India has adjourned a hearing until next week regarding a petition from three transgender doctors seeking the implementation of a 1% horizontal reservation for transgender candidates in postgraduate medical admissions under NEET-PG 2025-26. The petitioners argue that the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences’ failure to include this reservation violates the Supreme Court’s 2014 NALSA ruling, which mandates affirmative action for transgender persons in education and public employment. The court is hesitant to create uncertainty in the admission process by immediately earmarking seats, especially as counseling has not yet begun. The Union government has requested time to address the broader issue of reservation for transgender persons.

**News Article:**

**Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing on Transgender Medical Admission Quota Plea**

**NEW DELHI, September 18, 2025** – The Supreme Court of India has deferred a hearing on a petition seeking the implementation of a 1% horizontal reservation for transgender candidates in postgraduate medical admissions under the NEET-PG 2025-26. The petition, filed by three transgender doctors, alleges that the absence of such a reservation violates the spirit of the Supreme Court’s landmark 2014 NALSA ruling, which recognized transgender persons as a “third gender” and mandated affirmative action.

During Thursday’s hearing, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, representing the petitioners, requested the court to earmark seats under both the All India and State quotas for transgender candidates. However, Chief Justice B.R. Gavai expressed concerns that such an immediate directive could disrupt the ongoing admission process.

The National Medical Commission’s counsel informed the court that counseling for postgraduate medical courses had not yet commenced. Additional Solicitor General Archana Pathak Dave stated that the Solicitor General wished to address the broader implications of reservation policies for transgender individuals.

The court acknowledged that the 2014 ruling might require the provision of reservation and questioned why it had not been implemented. The court will resume the hearing on September 23, 2025.

Read More