Sun Sep 14 02:14:26 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary of the text and a news article based on that summary:
**Summary:**
The Supreme Court of India has ruled on a case involving a sexual harassment complaint filed by a faculty member against the Vice-Chancellor (V-C) of a West Bengal university. The complaint, filed in December 2023, alleged incidents dating back to September 2019, with the last incident in April 2023. The court acknowledged the incident happened, however, due to procedural technicalities of time limitations, dismissed it, however it ruled that the details of the harassment be included in the V-C’s resume, ensuring that the alleged wrongdoing “haunts him forever.” The court upheld the Calcutta High Court’s decision that the initial complaint was time-barred, being filed more than six months after the last alleged incident. While emphasizing the importance of forgiving the wrongdoer, the court stressed that the wrongdoing should not be forgotten. They stipulated that the judgment detailing the allegations should be permanently included in the V-C’s resume as a constant reminder of his actions.
**News Article:**
**Supreme Court Orders Sexual Harassment Allegations to Haunt V-C “Forever”**
*New Delhi, September 14, 2025* – The Supreme Court of India has delivered a unique verdict in a case of alleged sexual harassment, ordering that details of the accusations against a Vice-Chancellor (V-C) of a West Bengal university be included in his resume, effectively ensuring the allegations follow him throughout his career.
The ruling stems from a complaint filed in December 2023 by a faculty member accusing the V-C of sexual harassment, with incidents dating back to September 2019 and the last incident in April 2023. While the court acknowledged that the incidents occurred, a bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B Varale dismissed the original complaint due to procedural technicalities relating to time limitations.
Despite dismissing the case on these grounds, the court emphasized the need to acknowledge the incident. “It is advisable to forgive the wrongdoer, but not to forget the wrongdoing,” the bench stated in its order. To this end, the court mandated that a full account of the sexual harassment allegations be made a permanent fixture of the V-C’s professional resume.
The Supreme Court upheld an earlier decision by the Calcutta High Court, which had ruled the complaint was time-barred as it was filed beyond the stipulated period. The Court noted that the last alleged incident took place in April 2023, and the complaint was filed on December 26, 2023, beyond the extendable period of limitation of six months.
While actions taken against the faculty member later in August 2023 were deemed administrative in nature and not directly attributable to sexual harassment, the court’s decision to attach the allegations to the V-C’s resume sends a strong message about accountability and the enduring impact of such accusations, even when procedural hurdles prevent formal legal action.
The ruling is expected to spark debate on the balance between procedural justice and the need to address allegations of sexual misconduct in academic institutions.
First Piper 