Wed Sep 10 06:50:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

The Telangana High Court has directed the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TGPSC) to re-evaluate answer scripts from the Group-I Mains examination following a batch of writ petitions alleging irregularities and a lack of transparency in the exam process. The court cited previous instances of exam cancellations and criticized the TGPSC for negligence, inefficiency, and a biased approach. If re-evaluation isn’t feasible, the court ordered the TGPSC to re-conduct the examination within eight months, adhering to the original notification. The court also highlighted statistical anomalies in the selection of female candidates from specific exam centers as evidence supporting the allegations of irregularities. The court set aside the final marks list and General Ranking list of the examination.

**News Article:**

**Telangana High Court Orders Re-evaluation of Group-I Exam, Cites Irregularities**

**Hyderabad, September 9, 2025** – The Telangana High Court has delivered a significant blow to the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TGPSC), directing it to re-evaluate answer scripts from the Group-I Mains examination. The order comes after the court heard a batch of 13 writ petitions alleging irregularities, lack of transparency, and bias in the exam process.

Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao stated that the TGPSC “has not learnt from its previous experience,” referencing two prior instances where Group-I examinations were canceled. The court criticized the Commission for negligence and inefficiency, impacting the state’s unemployed youth and wasting candidates’ time and money. Many candidates had dedicated significant time, resources, and even career changes to prepare for the exam.

If re-evaluation is deemed impossible, the High Court has mandated a re-conduct of the examination within eight months, adhering to the original notification (No. 02/2024). The court cited a failure in both procedural aspects and the evaluation method.

“The Commission had not maintained transparency, integrity, acted in a biased manner and deviated from their own rules,” Justice Rao stated in the order.

The court also pointed to statistical anomalies as evidence supporting the claims of irregularities. Notably, a disproportionately high percentage of female candidates from specific exam centers were selected compared to other centers. The judge set aside the final marks list and the General Ranking List (GRL) announced by the Commission on March 10 and March 30 this year. Referring to the re-evaluation of the answer scripts, the judge said that the TGPSC should apply for the moderation method manually in terms of the Sanjay Singh and another vs Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission case verdict of the apex court and announce the results. Only based on such results, the 563 posts of Group-I cadre should be filled up, the judgement said.

The TGPSC has yet to issue a statement regarding the High Court’s order. The future of the Group-I recruitment process now hangs in the balance, awaiting the outcome of the re-evaluation or the announcement of a fresh examination date.

Read More