Tue Sep 02 07:52:48 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the provided text and its rewrite as a news article:

**Summary:**

The Delhi High Court is set to deliver its verdict on the bail pleas of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others implicated in a UAPA case related to the alleged conspiracy behind the February 2020 Delhi riots. The verdict is scheduled for September 2, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. The prosecution, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, has vehemently opposed the bail petitions, arguing that the riots were a premeditated act against the nation and those accused should remain in custody until conviction or acquittal. Actor Prakash Raj wrote of his concern for Umar Khalid, reflecting on his five years of incarceration and characterizing him and his parents as patriots.

**News Article:**

**Delhi High Court to Rule on Bail Pleas of Activists in 2020 Riots Case**

**New Delhi, September 2, 2025 (The Hindu):** The Delhi High Court is expected to pronounce its judgment today on the bail applications of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and other individuals facing prosecution under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The case is connected to the alleged conspiracy surrounding the February 2020 Delhi riots.

A division bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur is scheduled to deliver the order at 2:30 p.m. after reserving judgment on July 9th.

The prosecution has strongly opposed the bail pleas. During earlier arguments, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Delhi Police, asserted that those accused of actions against the nation should remain incarcerated until either convicted or acquitted. Mehta argued that the 2020 riots were not spontaneous but meticulously planned with malicious intent.

The case has drawn widespread attention, with actor Prakash Raj publicly expressing concern for Umar Khalid, who has been in custody for five years. In a recent article, Raj highlighted Khalid’s patriotism and the ordeal faced by his family.

The verdict is eagerly awaited, as it could have significant implications for the individuals involved and the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech and expression in India.

Read More