Sat Aug 30 03:59:42 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text, followed by a rewritten news article from the perspective of The Hindu, an Indian newspaper:

**Summary:**

A U.S. Federal Appeals Court has dealt a significant blow to President Donald Trump’s trade policies, ruling that he overstepped his authority by unilaterally imposing sweeping tariffs on almost all countries, citing national emergencies based on trade deficits and immigration issues. The court upheld a lower court ruling that found Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs exceeded his presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). While the ruling doesn’t immediately strike down the tariffs, it allows the administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump has vowed to fight the decision, claiming it would “destroy the United States.” The case does not affect other tariffs imposed under different laws like those on steel, aluminum, and autos, nor does it affect those tariffs that were imposed on China. If the ruling stands, it could weaken Trump’s negotiating power and potentially require the U.S. Treasury to refund collected import taxes, impacting U.S. finances and trade relations.

**News Article:**

**U.S. Court Reins in Trump’s Tariff Powers: Implications for Global Trade**

*The Hindu – Washington, August 30, 2025*

A U.S. Federal Appeals Court has significantly curtailed President Donald Trump’s ability to unilaterally impose tariffs, a move that could have wide-ranging implications for global trade relations and the U.S. economy. The court ruled on Friday that Mr. Trump exceeded his authority by declaring national emergencies to justify sweeping import taxes on nearly all countries, challenging his aggressive trade policies that have already roiled global markets.

The ruling, largely upholding an earlier decision by a specialized trade court, found that Mr. Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, implemented in April, exceeded the powers granted to the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Trump had justified the tariffs by citing U.S. trade deficits and immigration issues as national emergencies.

The decision is a setback for the Trump administration, which has used tariffs as a key tool in its trade negotiations. It underscores concerns about the potential for unchecked presidential power in matters of international commerce.

While the court’s decision allows the administration time to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, it injects uncertainty into the future of U.S. trade policy.

For India, a nation that has navigated complex trade relationships with the U.S. under both Trump and previous administrations, the ruling offers a glimmer of hope for a more predictable and rules-based trading environment. The potential rollback of tariffs could alleviate pressure on Indian exporters and reduce the risk of retaliatory measures from other nations.

However, the situation remains fluid. Mr. Trump has vowed to fight the decision, signaling a protracted legal battle. If the ruling stands, it could weaken the U.S. administration’s negotiating leverage and force it to rely on existing legal frameworks, limiting the speed and severity with which future tariffs can be implemented.

The case highlights the ongoing tension between executive authority and legislative oversight in the U.S. trade policy. The implications of the court’s decision will be closely watched by governments and businesses worldwide, as it could reshape the landscape of global trade for years to come.

**[End of Article]**

Read More