Sun Aug 31 17:23:22 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text, focusing on the key takeaways and rewriting it in a more news-oriented style, with an attempt to align it with the assumed Indian perspective suggested by the initial text snippets:

**Summary:**

Despite a U.S. appeals court ruling that deemed most of President Trump’s tariffs illegal, the Trump administration, according to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, insists it is continuing trade negotiations with its partners. The ruling challenges a central aspect of Trump’s trade policy. The administration plans to appeal to the Supreme Court and has alternative legal avenues, such as Section 338 of a 1930 trade law, to maintain tariffs if the Supreme Court upholds the appeals court decision. Business leaders are eager for a quick resolution to the uncertainty.

**News Article:**

**U.S. Tariffs in Limbo: Trump Administration Defiant Despite Court Ruling**

**WASHINGTON, August 31, 2025 (The Hindu) -** The future of U.S. trade policy is hanging in the balance after a U.S. appeals court ruled against the legality of many of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. However, the Trump administration is signaling its intent to push forward with trade negotiations regardless.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated on Sunday that the U.S. continues to work closely with negotiating partners. “People are moving forward with their deals, regardless of what this court may say in the interim,” Mr. Greer told Fox News.

The ruling, delivered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, challenges the foundation of Trump’s trade strategy, which relies heavily on tariffs to exert pressure in trade negotiations. The court argued that Congress did not explicitly grant the President the power to impose tariffs.

The Trump administration has vowed to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. Experts suggest that the administration has also been preparing alternative legal strategies to maintain its tariffs. Josh Lipsky of the Atlantic Council highlighted Section 338 of a 1930 trade law as a potential avenue. This section allows the president to impose significant duties on imports from countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.

President Trump has remained steadfast in his support for tariffs. In a social media post, he stated, “A big year ahead for the USA, maybe the BEST EVER, if the Tariffs are finally approved by the Courts!!!”

The uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy is causing concern among businesses. Senator James Lankford emphasized the need for a swift resolution to minimize instability for businesses.

The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for global trade and for countries like India, which are navigating an increasingly complex international trade landscape. Observers in India are closely monitoring the situation, weighing the potential impact on its own trade relationships and economic outlook. With the Supreme Court appeal and potential alternative legal pathways, the saga of U.S. tariffs is far from over, adding more uncertainty to the global trade order.

Read More