Fri Aug 29 22:41:34 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and a rewritten news article based on the text:

**Summary:**

A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on numerous trading partners are illegal, claiming he exceeded his authority by using emergency economic powers. However, the court is allowing the tariffs to remain in place until mid-October to allow time for an appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump has vowed to fight the ruling and take the case to the Supreme Court. The ruling could potentially undermine trade deals Trump has made with major partners such as the European Union.

**News Article:**

**Trump Tariffs Deemed Illegal by Appeals Court, Supreme Court Showdown Looms**

**Washington, D.C. – August 30, 2025** – A U.S. federal appeals court has dealt a significant blow to President Donald Trump’s trade policy, ruling that the majority of tariffs he imposed on international trading partners are illegal. The 7-4 decision, delivered Friday, August 29th, found that Mr. Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency economic powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement the widespread duties.

While affirming a lower court’s earlier ruling, the appeals court has granted a stay, allowing the tariffs to remain in effect until mid-October. This window provides an opportunity for the Trump administration to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, a move President Trump has already vowed to pursue.

“They know the United States of America will win in the end,” Trump stated on his Truth Social platform, asserting that the appeals court had “incorrectly” issued the ruling and that he would fight back with the support of the Supreme Court.

The tariffs, set at a baseline of 10% with higher rates for specific economies, have been a central pillar of President Trump’s economic agenda since his return to office in January. The ruling raises significant questions about the validity of trade deals struck with major partners, potentially impacting the European Union and others.

The court argued that while the IEEPA grants the President considerable authority during a declared national emergency, it does not explicitly include the power to impose tariffs or taxes. The U.S. Court of International Trade had previously ruled against the tariffs in May. The outcome of a potential Supreme Court case will have far-reaching implications for U.S. trade policy and its relationship with the global economy.

Read More