Mon Aug 25 17:54:48 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and rewritten news article based on the provided text:

**Summary:**

The article reports on a statement made by Viduthalai Chiruthaiagal Katchi (VCK) general secretary and MP D. Ravikumar, welcoming the Supreme Court’s stay on the Tamil Nadu government’s order to remove party flag poles. Ravikumar urged the state government to affirm that erecting flag poles is a democratic right. He also alleges bias in the removal process, claiming that VCK and Left party flag poles are being disproportionately targeted, and that an Ambedkar statue was even demolished during such operations.

**News Article:**

**Supreme Court Halts Flag Pole Removal in Tamil Nadu; VCK Welcomes Decision**

**CHENNAI (August 25, 2025)** – The Supreme Court has intervened in the ongoing dispute regarding the removal of party flag poles in Tamil Nadu, issuing a stay on the state government’s order. D. Ravikumar, general secretary of the Viduthalai Chiruthaiagal Katchi (VCK) and Member of Parliament for Villupuram, has lauded the court’s decision.

“We welcome the Supreme Court’s direction in this case,” Ravikumar stated, referring to the case filed by CPI (M) State secretary P. Shanmugam. He urged the Tamil Nadu government to respond within the next four weeks with an affidavit acknowledging that the erection of flag poles is a legitimate expression of democratic principles.

Ravikumar further accused state officials of selectively targeting flag poles belonging to the VCK and Left-leaning parties. “The removal of party flag poles is an attack on democracy and must be addressed,” he asserted. “Highways and police departments are acting with clear bias. In one instance in Chidambaram, authorities even went so far as to demolish a statue of Dr. Ambedkar during the removal process.”

The Supreme Court’s decision mandates that the status quo be maintained until the matter is further addressed. The case raises significant questions about freedom of expression and the impartiality of state actions regarding political displays. The Tamil Nadu government has yet to respond to the Supreme Court’s order or Ravikumar’s accusations.

**Important Considerations:**

* **Objectivity:** The news article tries to present the facts neutrally, even though Ravikumar’s statements are clearly from a particular viewpoint.
* **Attribution:** All claims and opinions are attributed to their source (D. Ravikumar).
* **Conciseness:** The article is short and to the point, focusing on the most important information.
* **Future Developments:** The article notes that the Tamil Nadu government has yet to respond, leaving room for further updates.

Read More