Sat Aug 23 16:08:54 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text, followed by a news article written from an Indian perspective:

**Summary:**

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is strongly condemning the United States’ deployment of warships near Venezuela’s coast. He sees this as an illegal act of aggression aimed at regime change, especially given the increased bounty placed on him by the Trump administration over drug trafficking charges. Maduro asserts this is a violation of international law and a threat to all of Latin America and the Caribbean. He has responded by mobilizing Venezuelan militias and calling for rallies against U.S. actions. The situation is rooted in the U.S. indictment of Maduro and other Venezuelan officials on narco-terrorism charges, allegations of leading a cocaine trafficking gang, and the U.S. refusal to recognize Maduro’s electoral victories.

**News Article:**

**U.S. Naval Deployment Sparks Outrage in Venezuela: A View from India**

**Caracas, Venezuela – August 23, 2025** – Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has vehemently denounced the United States’ deployment of warships off the Venezuelan coast, branding it an “immoral, criminal, and illegal” attempt at regime change. The move comes amid heightened tensions between the two nations, fueled by U.S. accusations of drug trafficking against Maduro and other top Venezuelan officials.

“Anyone who commits an act of aggression against a country in Latin America is attacking all countries,” Maduro declared, framing the situation as a threat to regional stability and international law.

The U.S. justification for the naval presence is cited as efforts to curb drug trafficking. However, Caracas views it as a direct threat to its sovereignty, particularly in light of the $50 million bounty placed on Maduro’s head by the U.S. government.

From an Indian perspective, this situation underscores the delicate balance between national sovereignty and international law. While the U.S. has legitimate concerns regarding drug trafficking, the deployment of military assets so close to Venezuela’s borders raises questions about the proportionality of the response and potential violations of international norms.

“The principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states is paramount,” said Dr. Arjun Sharma, a Delhi-based international relations expert. “While the U.S. has the right to pursue its interests, it must do so in a manner that respects the sovereignty of other nations and avoids actions that could escalate tensions.”

The situation is further complicated by the history of U.S. interventionism in Latin America, a legacy that fuels suspicion and mistrust of Washington’s motives in the region. India, with its own experience of dealing with powerful nations and its commitment to multilateralism, may act as mediators and advocates for peaceful resolution in the crisis.

Maduro has announced the mobilization of 4.5 million militia members and called for mass rallies to protest the U.S. actions. The coming days will be critical in determining whether the situation escalates further or if diplomatic channels can be opened to de-escalate tensions and find a resolution that respects the sovereignty of Venezuela and the principles of international law.

Read More