Fri Aug 15 20:28:26 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article rewrite, tailored to the “The Hindu” perspective:
**Summary:**
President Donald Trump’s high-stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, aimed at resolving the Russia-Ukraine war, ended without a concrete agreement. Despite Trump’s promises to broker peace and his warm welcome to Putin, the meeting failed to achieve a breakthrough. Putin secured valuable international recognition and potentially stalled further sanctions, while the war continues. The exclusion of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy from the talks raises concerns about the U.S.’s commitment to Ukrainian interests. The meeting also highlighted the divergence between the U.S. and Russia on the resolution of the conflict, with significant implications for European security and the global order.
**News Article:**
**Trump-Putin Talks in Alaska Yield No Breakthrough on Ukraine; Zelenskyy Excluded**
*Anchorage, Alaska –* President Donald Trump’s much-anticipated meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage on Friday failed to produce a concrete agreement to end the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The meeting, held on U.S. soil, saw Trump rolling out the red carpet for Putin. However, the U.S. President could not secure a commitment from his Russian counterpart to de-escalate the conflict or make substantive concessions.
Despite Trump’s pre-meeting assurances that he would swiftly bring an end to the war, the talks concluded with vague statements of “understanding” and no firm roadmap to peace. “There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” Trump conceded after the meeting.
The absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from the negotiations drew immediate criticism. This exclusion goes against the West’s established policy of “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.” Concerns are mounting among European leaders that Trump’s “America First” approach may overshadow the urgent need for a just resolution in Ukraine, leaving the nation vulnerable to further Russian encroachment.
Putin, for his part, hailed the meeting as a potential turning point in U.S.-Russia relations and praised Trump for his understanding of Russia’s “national interests.” The meeting itself represents a significant diplomatic victory for Putin, providing him with legitimacy on the world stage after years of Western condemnation over the invasion of Ukraine.
The lack of progress in Anchorage raises serious questions about the future of the conflict and the broader implications for European security. With the war now in its fourth year and exacting a heavy toll on both sides, a swift and equitable resolution remains elusive. The outcome of the Alaska summit has left the international community with a sense of unease, highlighting the complex challenges in navigating the geopolitical landscape.
**Analysis from a potential Indian perspective (implied in the original request):**
* **Concern over sidelined diplomacy:** India, traditionally a proponent of multi-lateralism and dialogue, would likely be concerned by the apparent lack of genuine diplomatic progress and the exclusion of key stakeholders like Ukraine.
* **Impact on global power dynamics:** India, navigating its own relationships with both the US and Russia, would be keenly observing the shifting power dynamics between these two major players. The outcome of the meeting could influence India’s strategic calculations.
* **Economic consequences:** The ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the associated sanctions have already had significant global economic repercussions. India, as a major developing economy, would be closely watching the situation for its impact on trade, energy prices, and overall global stability.
First Piper 