Sun Aug 03 15:33:15 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a news article based on the provided text, followed by a brief summary:
**Summary:**
The article reports on the conviction of former Indian MP Prajwal Revanna for rape, highlighting the innovative use of forensic technology in the investigation. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) successfully employed image superimposition techniques, including matching identifying marks and even vein structures of genitals, to link Revanna to video evidence of the crime. This is reportedly the first instance of this particular forensic method being used in Karnataka.
**News Article:**
**Indian Court Convicts Former MP in Rape Case, Landmark Forensic Technique Used**
**Bengaluru, August 3, 2025** – Former Member of Parliament Prajwal Revanna has been convicted of rape in a landmark case in Karnataka, India. The conviction hinged, in part, on a novel forensic technique that involved superimposing images of crime scenes and the accused, including his genitals, with video evidence of the sexual assault.
Judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat, of the Special Court of Session for criminal cases against former and present MP/MLAs, lauded the Special Investigation Team (SIT) for its utilization of advanced technology, calling it a “welcome step” in criminal investigations.
The SIT, led by Additional Director General of Police B.K. Singh, used the method for the first time in Karnataka. After Revanna’s arrest, photographs of his body parts, including his genitals, were taken and compared with those visible in the video evidence. Forensic teams also photographed the crime scenes, including a room in Revanna’s farmhouse and his residence in Basavanagudi.
The investigation team then superimposed images of the scenes with those from the videos. This meticulous process extended to matching distinctive physical features. “The superimposed image of the victim at the place of incident, and also the body parts, the fabric that was worn, were all compared,” the judgement stated. “Further, the photograph of the accused concerning a specific identification mark, when superimposed and compared with the image, would indicate that the very same mole and identification mark matched with each other.”
Crucially, the analysis extended to comparing vein structures of the genitals. The court noted that the visible features, particularly the pattern and placement of the veins, “strongly suggest that the visible characteristics are consistent across two visuals and both images depicted the same individual.”
The successful application of this advanced forensic technique in the Revanna case is expected to set a new precedent for investigations involving video evidence in India.
First Piper 