Mon Jul 28 19:19:43 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and rewrite of the provided text as a news article, keeping in mind the Indian perspective implied by the source:

**Summary:**

The Delhi High Court has requested a response from the police regarding a petition filed by student activist Asif Iqbal Tanha. Tanha is challenging the charges framed against him in connection with violence during the 2019 protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in the Jamia Nagar area of Delhi. A trial court previously framed charges against Tanha and others, alleging conspiracy and instigating violence based on speeches and actions during the protests. The High Court will hear the case again on October 30th. The case originates from the widespread protests following the passage of the CAA in December 2019.

**News Article:**

**Delhi High Court Seeks Police Response in CAA Protest Case Involving Student Activist**

**New Delhi, July 29, 2025:** The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Police to respond to a petition filed by student activist Asif Iqbal Tanha, who is challenging the charges framed against him in connection with the violence that occurred during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in December 2019. The protests, which took place in the Jamia Nagar area of South Delhi, followed the passage of the CAA in Parliament.

Tanha’s petition questions the trial court’s decision in March to frame charges against him and ten others, accusing them of “abetment by prior conspiracy as well as by instigating violent mob activity at the spot.” The charges were brought under the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and the Arms Act.

The trial court, in framing the charges, specifically highlighted a December 13, 2019 speech delivered by another accused, Imam, near Jamia University, characterizing it as “venomous” and “hate speech” that incited religious discord. The court alleges that Tanha, along with others, actively participated in instigating the violent demonstrations.

Section 109 of the IPC, under which Tanha has been charged, deals with the abetment of an offense and carries the same punishment as the principal offender.

The case is rooted in the widespread protests that erupted at Jamia Millia Islamia and Shaheen Bagh in the wake of the CAA’s passage on December 11, 2019. The protests, which drew significant participation from students and members of the Muslim community, expressed concerns about the Act’s implications for Indian citizenship and secular values.

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the next hearing for October 30th, when the police are expected to submit their response to Tanha’s petition. The case remains a focal point, raising critical questions about freedom of speech, the right to protest, and the application of law in cases involving political dissent.

Read More