Fri Jul 25 09:24:22 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the provided text and a rewrite as a news article:
**Summary:**
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the central government did not discriminate against Andhra Pradesh and Telangana by conducting delimitation in Jammu & Kashmir while not doing so in the Telugu states. The court cited Article 170(3) of the Constitution, stating that delimitation in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana can only occur after the 2026 census. The court dismissed a petition seeking immediate delimitation in the two states based on the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act of 2014.
**News Article:**
**Supreme Court Upholds Centre’s Delimitation Decision, Cites Constitutional Mandate**
**NEW DELHI -** The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a plea seeking immediate delimitation of assembly constituencies in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, ruling that the central government did not act discriminatorily by conducting the exercise in Jammu & Kashmir first. The judgment, delivered today, cited Article 170(3) of the Constitution as the basis for the decision.
A bench headed by Justice Surya Kant stated that the constitutional provision mandates readjustment of assembly seats and division of states into territorial constituencies only *after* each census. As such, the court ruled that delimitation in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, governed by Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act of 2014, must wait until after the 2026 census.
The plea was filed by K. Purushottam Reddy, who argued that the Centre should have operationalized Section 26 of the Reorganisation Act sooner. The Supreme Court’s decision effectively puts an end to immediate prospects for delimitation in the two Telugu-speaking states, pending the next national census. This ruling has implications for the political landscape of both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, potentially impacting future election dynamics.
First Piper 