Mon Jul 14 19:51:48 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text, formatted as requested:
**Summary:**
In July 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to proceed with its plan to dismantle the Department of Education. This action overturns a lower court’s order that had blocked mass layoffs and the transfer of the department’s functions to other agencies. Trump’s administration argues that the move will reduce the federal government’s role in education, giving more control to the states. Opponents argue the dismantling will cripple the department’s ability to provide crucial services and oversight, especially for disadvantaged students and schools. The decision follows Trump’s long-held promise to downsize the department, a move criticized by Democratic attorneys general, school districts, and unions. The case remains in lower courts.
**News Article:**
**U.S. Supreme Court Greenlights Trump’s Education Department Dismantling**
*Washington D.C. – July 15, 2025* – The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump’s administration to resume its efforts to dismantle the Department of Education. In a brief, unsigned order issued Monday, the court lifted a lower court injunction that had halted mass layoffs and the transfer of key functions to other federal agencies. This represents a significant victory for the Trump administration, which aims to reduce the federal government’s role in education and return more control to state governments.
The move reverses a previous ruling by U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, who argued that the administration’s actions would cripple the department’s ability to carry out its statutory duties. The decision follows Trump’s March announcement, where he vowed to return education “back to the states where it belongs.”
Opponents, including a group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts, and unions, have warned that the dismantling will impair the department’s ability to administer college loans, track student achievement, enforce civil rights in schools, and provide federal funding for needy districts and students with disabilities. They also argued that mass firings would delay the disbursement of critical aid.
The Justice Department, in its appeal to the Supreme Court, accused the lower court of judicial overreach. The three liberal justices dissented from the Supreme Court’s order.
The long-term implications of the Department of Education’s downsizing remain to be seen, as the legal challenge continues to play out in lower courts. The administration intends to transfer the department’s $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. The action has sparked debate about the appropriate role of the federal government in education and the potential impact on students and schools nationwide.
First Piper 