Wed Jul 16 07:10:54 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the provided text, followed by a rewrite as a news article:

**Summary:**

The provided text is an article from The Hindu, published on July 16, 2025. It reports that the Supreme Court of India has requested a response from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) regarding a bail plea filed by Allahrakha Abu Bakar Manoori. Manoori was arrested seven years prior for allegedly assisting individuals accused of terrorist activities, including providing vehicles and arms. The Bombay High Court had previously denied Manoori bail, citing the seriousness of the charges and the potential life sentence he faces if convicted. The prosecution argued that Manoori was involved in planning terrorist acts, including bomb blasts. The High Court also noted the advanced stage of the trial, with the prosecution aiming to conclude it by year-end.

**News Article:**

**Supreme Court Seeks NIA Response on Bail Plea in Terrorism Case**

**New Delhi, July 16, 2025** – The Supreme Court of India today requested a response from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) regarding a bail application filed by Allahrakha Abu Bakar Manoori, who has been incarcerated for seven years on charges of aiding and abetting terrorist activities.

A bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh issued the notice, prompting the NIA to present its case regarding Manoori’s continued detention. Manoori’s legal team argues that his long period of imprisonment warrants consideration for bail.

The case stems from allegations that Manoori provided vehicles and arms to individuals allegedly trained in Pakistan for carrying out terrorist acts, including bomb blasts. The Bombay High Court previously denied his bail request on March 28, citing the gravity of the charges and the potential life sentence upon conviction.

The prosecution has argued that Manoori actively planned to support terrorist activities, posing a significant threat to national security. The High Court echoed these concerns, emphasizing the severity of the alleged offenses and the substantial evidence against the accused.

While the trial is reportedly progressing well, with the prosecution aiming for completion by the end of the year, the Supreme Court’s intervention introduces a new dimension to the case, raising questions about the balance between national security concerns and individual rights. The NIA’s response will be crucial in determining the next steps in this ongoing legal battle.

Read More