Sat Jul 12 02:52:32 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text and a rewrite of it as a news article, formatted for an Indian audience (since the prompt requests it):
**Summary:**
A U.S. federal judge issued an order halting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests by the Trump administration in seven California counties. The order came in response to a lawsuit filed by immigrant advocacy groups alleging that the administration was systematically targeting people of color during immigration raids. The judge cited a “mountain of evidence” suggesting constitutional violations. The order also mandates attorney access to a detention facility in Los Angeles. The administration denies the allegations, claiming enforcement operations are targeted and based on due diligence, not race. The controversy has sparked protests and legal challenges, highlighting concerns about racial profiling and due process in immigration enforcement.
**News Article:**
**The Hindu: U.S. Court Halts Trump Administration’s Immigration Raids in California**
**Los Angeles, July 12, 2025:** A U.S. federal judge has delivered a significant blow to President Donald Trump’s administration, ordering a halt to what critics describe as indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven counties across California, including Los Angeles. The move comes after a lawsuit filed by immigrant advocacy groups accused the administration of targeting individuals based on race during its ongoing immigration crackdown.
Judge Maame E. Frimpong of the U.S. District Court issued the order on Friday (July 11, 2025) after advocacy groups presented arguments that the government was violating the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. She noted there was a “mountain of evidence” indicating government misconduct. The lawsuit included testimony from detained immigrants and U.S. citizens who claim they were unfairly targeted. One U.S. citizen stated that they were detained despite showing authorities appropriate identification.
The order specifically prohibits immigration officials from using apparent race or ethnicity, accents, or presence at certain locations like car washes or construction sites as the primary basis for suspicion.
The legal challenge alleges that the administration is engaging in unconstitutional tactics, including detaining individuals based on race, conducting warrantless arrests, and restricting access to legal counsel. According to the ACLU, these actions are driven by arbitrary arrest quotas and broad stereotypes based on race or ethnicity.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, vehemently denied these claims. In an email, she stated, “any claims that individuals have been ‘targeted’ by law enforcement because of their skin color are disgusting and categorically FALSE.” She maintained that enforcement operations are targeted and based on thorough investigations.
The court order also addresses concerns regarding access to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in downtown Los Angeles. Lawyers have reported being denied entry to the facility, and detainees are allegedly being deprived of adequate access to phones and legal representation. The order mandates unrestricted access for attorneys and confidential phone access for detainees.
The situation has ignited widespread protests in Southern California, with tens of thousands participating in rallies against the raids and the deployment of the National Guard and Marines. This ruling follows a previous injunction barring warrantless arrests by Customs and Border Protection agents in eastern California.
First Piper 