Tue Jul 08 12:20:00 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a news article based on the provided text:
**Summary:**
A federal judge in Denver sanctioned two attorneys representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, ordering them to pay $3,000 each, after they submitted a court filing riddled with errors generated by artificial intelligence. The filing, submitted as part of Lindell’s defamation case related to the 2020 election, contained fabricated case citations and misquoted legal precedents. The judge cited the attorneys’ contradictory statements and lack of explanation as reasons for the sanction, emphasizing that the errors warranted punishment.
**News Article:**
**AI-Generated Legal Filing Costs Lindell’s Attorneys $6,000 in Sanctions**
**Denver, CO** – Two attorneys representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell have been ordered to pay $3,000 each in sanctions after a federal judge found they submitted a court filing containing numerous errors generated by artificial intelligence. Judge Nina Y. Wang of the U.S. District Court in Denver issued the ruling on Monday, citing nearly 30 defective citations, including nonexistent cases and misquotations of case law, in the motion.
The problematic filing was submitted as part of Lindell’s defamation case, which concluded last month with a jury finding him liable for pushing false claims about the 2020 presidential election.
According to the ruling, the motion misrepresented court precedents and referenced irrelevant legal principles. Attorney Christopher Kachouroff admitted to using generative AI to draft the motion during a pretrial hearing.
Judge Wang stated that she did not enjoy sanctioning attorneys but deemed it necessary in this instance. She noted inconsistencies in the attorneys’ explanations and a lack of corroborating evidence led her to conclude the filing was not an inadvertent error. She also addressed Kachouroff’s accusation that the court tried to “blindside” him over the errors as “troubling and not well-taken.”
“Neither Mr. Kachouroff nor Ms. DeMaster provided the Court any explanation as to how those citations appeared in any draft of the Opposition absent the use of generative artificial intelligence or gross carelessness by counsel,” Wang wrote.
The Colorado Sun has reached out to Kachouroff and DeMaster for comment but has not yet received a response.
This case highlights the growing concerns surrounding the use of AI in legal practice and the importance of careful review and verification of AI-generated content before submission to the courts.
First Piper 