Mon Jun 30 11:58:00 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text, followed by a news article rewrite:

**Summary:**

The UK High Court has ruled in favor of the British government, determining that the sale of F-35 jet parts to a consortium accessible to Israel does not violate the law. This decision follows a challenge from human rights organizations, led by Al-Haq, who argued that the parts could be used by Israel in operations violating international law, particularly in Gaza. Despite a partial suspension of arms licenses to Israel, the UK government made a specific exception for F-35 parts. The court ultimately deferred to the executive branch’s decision-making power in this sensitive political issue. Amnesty U.K. has expressed disappointment with the ruling.

**News Article:**

**UK Court Upholds F-35 Jet Part Sales to Consortium Including Israel**

**London – June 30, 2025** – The U.K. High Court has sided with the British government in a legal challenge regarding the sale of F-35 jet parts to a consortium that includes access for Israel. The ruling, announced today, dismisses a case brought by a coalition of human rights organizations, spearheaded by the West Bank-based NGO Al-Haq.

Al-Haq argued that the supply of these parts could enable Israel to conduct military operations in Gaza that violate international law. The organization sought to halt the sales, claiming the U.K. government was complicit in potential war crimes.

While the U.K. government had previously suspended approximately 30 out of 350 arms licenses to Israel, a specific exemption was made for components related to the F-35 fighter jet.

The High Court judges stated that this issue was “acutely sensitive and political” and therefore fell under the purview of the executive branch, which is democratically accountable to parliament and the electorate.

“The decision to participate in such a consortium was a decision for the executive and not the courts,” the ruling stated.

Amnesty U.K. has voiced its disappointment with the court’s decision. Other human rights groups are also expected to issue statements criticizing the ruling and exploring further legal options.

Read More