Fri Jun 27 15:20:36 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the article, followed by a news report version written from the perspective of an Indian news source, as indicated by the provided introductory text.

**Summary:**

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has expressed regret for using the phrase “island of strangers” in a speech regarding immigration. The phrase, used weeks prior, drew criticism for its similarity to Enoch Powell’s controversial “rivers of blood” speech from 1968, which warned of the dangers of Commonwealth immigration. Starmer claims he was unaware of the historical connotations and deeply regrets using the language. His original speech came after gains by the Reform U.K. party in local elections, putting pressure on the Labour government.

**News Article:**

**Starmer Regrets “Island of Strangers” Remark, Sparks Debate on Immigration Rhetoric in UK**

**LONDON -** British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has expressed regret for using the phrase “island of strangers” in a recent speech addressing immigration, a remark that has ignited controversy and drawn comparisons to past instances of divisive rhetoric in the UK.

Weeks after his speech, delivered on May 12th prior to the release of the government’s white paper on restrictive migration policies, Starmer admitted in an interview with The Observer that he “deeply regret[s]” using the phrase.

The comment drew sharp criticism, with many pointing to its similarity to Enoch Powell’s infamous 1968 “rivers of blood” speech, which warned of the potential for racial unrest due to immigration from Commonwealth countries. Powell’s speech cast the migrants and their children as strangers in their homeland.

“I wouldn’t have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell,” Starmer stated. “But that particular phrase – no – it wasn’t right.”

The incident occurs amidst a shifting political landscape in the UK. The Reform U.K. party, known for its nativist stance, achieved significant gains in the local elections held in early May, adding pressure on Starmer’s Labour government, despite their landslide victory in the general election last year.

From an Indian perspective, the controversy highlights the ongoing complexities surrounding immigration debates in Western nations. With India being a major source country for migrants, the language used by political leaders in destination countries is of significant interest. This incident serves as a reminder of the sensitivity surrounding immigration and the potential for even unintentional phrases to evoke historical prejudices. The incident underscores the scrutiny that politicians now face regarding immigration rhetoric.

Read More