Thu Jun 19 04:38:14 UTC 2025: Okay, here’s a summary and a rewritten news article based on the text provided:
**Summary:**
Gulbarga University suspects irregularities, including potential mark tampering, in the evaluation of B.Ed examination answer sheets from December 2024. Due to suspiciously identical marks among some students across subjects, and significant mark increases after re-evaluation, the university has requested permission from the Department of Higher Education to launch a Criminal Investigation Department (CID) investigation. Additionally, the university seeks to re-evaluate all 6,566 answer papers with evaluators from outside the district and custodians from government and aided colleges to ensure impartiality and rectify flaws in the evaluation process.
**News Article:**
**Gulbarga University Seeks CID Probe into B.Ed Exam Irregularities**
**Kalaburagi, June 19, 2025** – Gulbarga University has requested a formal investigation by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) into suspected irregularities in the evaluation of B.Ed examination answer sheets. The university’s decision follows concerns raised regarding potential mark tampering and erratic evaluation practices during the December 2024 B.Ed exams, which were taken by 6,566 students.
According to university officials, the irregularities were first flagged by the Vice-Chancellor, who noticed instances of students achieving identical scores across multiple subjects. Further scrutiny revealed significant increases in marks after re-evaluation, raising serious doubts about the initial assessment process.
“We observed patterns that were highly unusual and warranted further investigation,” stated Registrar Ramesh Londonkar to *The Hindu*. “To ensure transparency and accountability, we have requested the Higher Education Department’s permission to involve the CID in a comprehensive investigation.”
In addition to seeking a CID probe, the university’s syndicate has also proposed a comprehensive re-evaluation of all 6,566 answer papers. To maintain impartiality, the university aims to appoint custodians and assistant custodians from government and aided colleges. Additionally, evaluators will be selected from universities in neighboring districts to ensure a fresh and unbiased perspective.
“We are committed to identifying and rectifying any flaws in our evaluation system to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future,” Londonkar added. “A high-level inquiry has also been initiated within the university to strengthen our processes and safeguard the integrity of our examinations.”
The Department of Higher Education is yet to respond to the university’s request for a CID investigation. The outcome of the investigation and re-evaluation could have significant implications for the students involved and the university’s reputation.
First Piper 