Sun Jun 15 02:53:25 UTC 2025: **Summary:**
Rajasthan Minister Jawahar Singh Bedham has requested the Director General of Police (DGP) to draft a proposal for replacing Urdu and Persian words used in the police department with Hindi equivalents. Bedham argues that the current terminology disadvantages candidates who do not study Urdu and that the shift would make the language more accessible to the public and easier for new recruits to understand. He claims police officers across districts have expressed this need. The proposal will be reviewed by the Chief Minister before potential implementation.
**News Article:**
**Rajasthan Minister Calls for Hindi Replacement of Urdu in Police Terminology**
**Jaipur, Rajasthan – June 15, 2025:** Rajasthan Minister Jawahar Singh Bedham has sparked debate with a call to simplify language used within the state’s police force. In a letter to the Director General of Police (DGP) on Friday, June 13, 2025, Bedham proposed replacing Urdu and Persian words with Hindi equivalents, arguing that the current terminology is outdated and hinders accessibility.
“Urdu and Persian words are no longer in use,” Bedham told ANI. “We should use Hindi words.” He stated that many students preparing for competitive exams in Rajasthan do not study Urdu, putting them at a disadvantage when joining the police force. He also emphasized that police officers in several districts have expressed concerns about the difficulty of current jargon.
Bedham believes the change would benefit both new police recruits and the public, clarifying terminology and making the department’s work more transparent. “We should simplify the words so that the common man can understand them,” the Minister explained, adding that the draft is intended to replace language that “has become irrelevant”.
The DGP has been requested to draft a proposal identifying specific words for replacement. Once completed, the draft will be submitted to the Chief Minister for review and potential implementation across Rajasthan’s police departments. This move, however, is likely to spark further debate on language policy in the state, similar to previous controversies surrounding language requirements for government posts.