Tue Jun 03 16:56:54 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary and rewrite of the provided text as a news article:
**Summary:**
The Calcutta High Court has agreed to hear petitions challenging the West Bengal government’s new teacher recruitment process, following the Supreme Court’s cancellation of approximately 26,000 teaching and non-teaching appointments made in 2016 due to irregularities. While the government seeks a review from the Supreme Court, affected teachers and waitlisted candidates are disputing the new recruitment guidelines. Sacked teachers are protesting and demanding reinstatement, while some waitlisted candidates object to provisions favoring sacked teachers, like additional marks for prior experience. Some affected teachers are asking for a reevaluation of the old test sheets and believe they should only compete with the original vacancy pool from the old testing process. Also, police have summoned two teachers for questioning related to the protests.
**News Article:**
**West Bengal Teacher Recruitment Faces New Legal Challenges Amid Protests**
**KOLKATA, June 3, 2025** – The ongoing saga surrounding teacher recruitment in West Bengal took another turn today as the Calcutta High Court granted permission to hear petitions challenging the state government’s latest recruitment process. The move comes after the Supreme Court’s April 3rd ruling that nullified approximately 26,000 teaching and non-teaching appointments from the 2016 selection process, citing widespread irregularities.
Simultaneously, protests intensified in Kolkata, with teachers and non-teaching staff who lost their jobs marching to Bikash Bhawan, demanding reinstatement. The State Education Department has issued a notification for a new State Level Selection Test (SLST) for assistant teachers, while also filing a review petition with the Supreme Court seeking modifications to its original order.
The new recruitment process has drawn criticism from multiple sides. While many of the sacked teachers are pushing to be excluded from competing in the new process, others feel they should only compete against those who also applied in 2016. Meanwhile, waitlisted candidates from the 2016 panel have filed petitions arguing that the new notification violates the Supreme Court’s directives. They specifically object to the allocation of additional marks for prior teaching experience, a provision not present in the 2016 process.
“We should only compete for the number of declared vacancies of 2016 for which we had originally applied,” said Suvojit Das, a teacher whose appointment was cancelled. He suggested a re-evaluation of the 2016 exam sheets to distinguish meritorious candidates from those involved in the alleged irregularities.
Adding to the complexity, the Detective Department of the Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate has summoned two protesting teachers, Amit Ranjan Bhuiyan and Mehebub Mondal, for questioning.
The Calcutta High Court is expected to hear the petitions later this week, setting the stage for further legal battles as the state attempts to resolve the ongoing crisis in its education system.
First Piper 