Mon May 19 15:35:06 UTC 2025: Here’s a summary of the text and a news article based on it:

**Summary:**

The Indian government, on May 19, 2025, defended its decision to revoke the security clearances of Turkish firm Celebi Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd. and its associated company in the Delhi High Court. The government argued that the revocation was a national security measure based on intelligence inputs. The Turkish firm, operating in India for 17 years, challenged the decision, stating no prior reason was given and potentially impacting 14,000 employees. The court has scheduled a further hearing on May 21.

**News Article:**

**India Cites National Security in Defending Revocation of Turkish Firm’s Airport Clearances**

**New Delhi – May 19, 2025** – The Indian government defended its decision to revoke the security clearances of Turkish firm Celebi Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd. and its associated company, Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt. Ltd., in the Delhi High Court today. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, argued that the revocation was a matter of national security based on specific intelligence inputs, emphasizing the sensitivity of airport and cargo handling operations.

“The enemy can try 10 times and succeed once, country has to succeed all the time,” Mehta stated, highlighting the government’s stance.

The Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) revoked the clearances shortly after Turkey’s public criticism of India’s actions regarding terror camps in a neighboring country. Celebi, which has been operating in India for 17 years, provides ground and cargo handling services at several Indian airports.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Celebi, argued that the companies had operated “without any blemish” and were not given an opportunity to respond to the concerns before the revocation. He also raised concerns about the potential impact on the company’s 14,000 employees across India. “No reason was given (in the order). It appears to be because of public perception… By a one line order, the entire business goes for a toss,” Rohatgi submitted.

The case is slated for further hearing on May 21. The High Court bench acknowledged the government’s “better safe than sorry” stance, hinting at the complexities of balancing business interests with national security concerns.

Read More