
Fri May 09 03:50:00 UTC 2025: ## Top Election Lawyer Marc Elias Declares Continued Fight Against Trump After 60 Minutes Appearance
**Washington, D.C.** – Longtime opponent of Donald Trump and prominent election lawyer Marc Elias has vowed to continue his fight against the former president, following a recent appearance on 60 Minutes and a federal court victory blocking a Trump executive order targeting Elias’s former law firm, Perkins Coie.
Elias, who served as general counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, has been a frequent target of Trump’s ire for over a decade. The former president has accused Elias of various offenses, including undermining his election campaigns and engaging in unscrupulous behavior. These accusations, which Elias vehemently denies, culminated in lawsuits and executive orders aimed at punishing Elias and his associates.
This past Friday, a federal judge permanently blocked one such executive order, highlighting Trump’s unprecedented attempts to retaliate against those he perceives as political opponents. The judge cited Trump’s public statements, including social media posts threatening investigations and prosecutions of lawyers assisting political opponents.
Elias’s 60 Minutes interview further illuminated the ongoing conflict. He discussed the reluctance of large law firms to publicly oppose Trump’s actions, even when targeted themselves, citing fear of retribution. Elias also highlighted the bravery of colleagues who risked their careers to stand against the former president’s attempts to undermine democratic processes.
Despite facing years of relentless attacks, including lawsuits and online harassment, Elias shows no signs of backing down. He stated his intention to continue fighting Trump and his “authoritarian vision” for the country, emphasizing the importance of protecting free and fair elections. His commitment is further underscored by his work with Democracy Docket, a media company he founded to expose Trump’s election-related falsehoods.
Elias’s continued defiance and the federal court’s decision represent a significant development in the ongoing battle against political retribution and the fight to uphold democratic principles. The interview serves as a stark reminder of the pressures faced by those who dare to challenge powerful figures, and underscores the importance of continued vigilance in safeguarding democratic institutions.