Wed Apr 30 16:50:00 UTC 2025: ## EPA’s PFAS Drinking Water Limits Face Legal Challenge, Raising Concerns for Millions
**Wilmington, NC** – The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) landmark rule setting strict limits on “forever chemicals” known as PFAS in drinking water is facing a legal challenge, leaving millions of Americans in limbo. The case highlights the ongoing struggle to balance public health concerns with the considerable costs of removing these harmful substances from water supplies.
The EPA’s 2024 rule established limits for two common PFAS chemicals at 4 parts per trillion (ppt), a level near the detection limit. However, approximately 12% of US water utilities currently exceed these limits, prompting a lawsuit from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). The AWWA argues that the standards are too stringent, overly costly, and infeasible for many smaller utilities.
The case underscores the complex health implications of PFAS. Chris Meek, a North Carolina teacher, survived kidney cancer which he believes was linked to PFAS exposure through his drinking water. His case illustrates the human impact of PFAS contamination, which has already prompted many communities, including Wilmington, NC, to implement costly filtration systems. Although the EPA has acknowledged links between PFAS and various health problems, including kidney cancer, research specifically linking GenX, a type of PFAS found in North Carolina, to kidney cancer remains limited. Chemours, a major PFAS manufacturer, maintains that low-level GenX exposure poses no significant health threat.
The Biden administration’s EPA, while setting strict limits, acknowledged the economic burden. The rule’s estimated annual cost of $1.5 billion would more than double the health benefits if fully implemented. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, while previously supportive of PFAS regulation, has indicated a willingness to consider flexibility, particularly for communities with limited resources, raising concerns about the potential weakening of the rule.
The upcoming court decision will determine whether the EPA’s stringent limits remain in place or are relaxed. A weakening of the rule would likely lead to increased PFAS levels in drinking water and could significantly impact public health. The high cost of compliance also presents challenges for smaller utilities, potentially impacting their ability to maintain existing infrastructure. Despite the financial burden, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law offers some financial assistance, and settlements with PFAS polluters may also provide funding.
This legal battle reflects the broader struggle to balance public health, economic realities, and the responsibilities of both the government and water utilities in protecting the nation’s drinking water supply. The outcome will have far-reaching consequences for millions of Americans.
First Piper 