Tue Apr 22 03:00:00 UTC 2025: ## Vice-President’s Criticism of Judiciary Sparks Debate in India

**NEW DELHI, April 22, 2025** – Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s recent speech questioning aspects of the Indian judiciary’s independence and actions has ignited a national debate. Dhankhar raised concerns about several key issues, including the lack of transparency in judicial inquiries, the Supreme Court’s imposition of timelines on the President and Governors, and the judiciary’s accountability to the public.

Dhankhar specifically criticized the opaque nature of an investigation into alleged misconduct by a Delhi High Court judge, questioning the legality of the process. He also challenged the Supreme Court’s ruling mandating timelines for presidential and gubernatorial action on state legislation, arguing that it overstepped boundaries. Furthermore, he expressed concerns about the judiciary’s use of its extensive powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, suggesting it could undermine representative democracy. He also questioned the composition of the Supreme Court’s constitutional benches, noting the disparity between the current size of the court and the 1950s rules requiring five judges.

The Vice-President’s remarks have drawn criticism for potentially exceeding the bounds of his ceremonial role. However, public apprehension regarding the lack of transparency in judicial inquiries is widespread. Experts suggest that a more transparent process is needed to build public trust.

While some argue Dhankhar’s concerns highlight legitimate issues regarding judicial accountability and transparency – particularly in the collegium system for judicial appointments – others maintain the Supreme Court acted within its constitutional rights in setting timelines for the executive. They point to precedents and similar measures taken by the executive branch itself. Furthermore, they highlight the judiciary’s crucial role in upholding constitutional principles and providing justice through “judicial activism,” citing landmark cases where Article 142 was instrumental in achieving positive societal change.

The debate underscores the complex relationship between the judiciary, the executive, and the legislature within India’s constitutional framework, a blend of parliamentary sovereignty and judicial supremacy. Experts emphasize the need for a healthy separation of powers and adherence to constitutional values to maintain a balanced governance structure.

Read More