Wed Sep 25 07:45:28 UTC 2024: ## Kāinga Ora Announces Further Job Cuts Amidst Criticism

**Wellington, New Zealand** – Kāinga Ora, the government’s social housing agency, has announced a further 321 job cuts, bringing the total number of roles to be disestablished to 553. This comes amidst growing pressure on the agency to improve performance and cut costs.

The cuts, which are part of a wider government initiative to reduce public sector spending, are expected to affect roles across urban planning, design, commercial, construction, and investment management.

Kāinga Ora CEO Matt Crockett defended the decision, stating that the agency had grown significantly over the past five years and was now entering a “steadier state” of construction and upgrades. He assured the public that the cuts would not impact the agency’s ability to deliver on its housing mandate.

Housing Minister Chris Bishop echoed this sentiment, stating that the government’s priorities were clear: financial sustainability, efficiency, and cost-cutting. He emphasized that the decision to cut jobs was Kāinga Ora’s own, but he acknowledged that the agency was under pressure to improve its performance, citing a recent critical review.

While the government maintains that the cuts will not affect the agency’s performance, the Public Service Association (PSA) has expressed concerns. PSA National Secretary Duane Leo highlighted the importance of the roles being cut, including architects, technical advisors, and urban designers, and warned that the cuts could lead to a decrease in the number of houses available.

The Opposition has also voiced concerns, with Labour Party deputy leader Carmel Sepuloni highlighting the impact on morale and the potential for disruption to vital services. She accused the government of not prioritizing housing, particularly in terms of maintenance and construction.

Kāinga Ora will now consult with its staff and plans to confirm the final number of job cuts in mid-November. The announcement has sparked debate about the balance between government efficiency and the potential impact on public services and employment.

Read More