Sun Sep 15 17:44:14 UTC 2024: ## Supreme Court Leaks Reveal Internal Turmoil, Kagan’s Influence, and Roberts’s Failing Leadership
**Washington D.C. (September 16, 2024)** – A recent exposé by the New York Times has revealed a shocking level of internal conflict and manipulation within the Supreme Court, specifically regarding the handling of three high-profile cases involving former President Trump.
Constitutional law professor Josh Blackman, analyzing the Times’s findings, highlights several alarming trends:
* **Systematic Leaks:** The leaks, which expose confidential discussions, shifting votes, and internal memoranda, are far more extensive than the Dobbs leak. Blackman argues that these leaks point to a coordinated effort involving multiple sources within the court, potentially coordinated by Justice Kagan.
* **Kagan’s Influence:** The reporting notably excludes any information about Justice Kagan’s involvement in the deliberations, suggesting a deliberate strategy of using the leak to undermine her colleagues. Blackman points to Kagan’s past actions, such as public criticism of the court, as evidence of her willingness to manipulate proceedings for her own agenda.
* **Roberts’s Failing Leadership:** Blackman criticizes Chief Justice Roberts for failing to effectively address the leaks following the Dobbs debacle. The Times’s reporting indicates that Roberts, despite implementing strict limitations on access to court information, appears unable to control the flow of information.
* **Alito’s Diminishing Power:** The article reveals that Justice Alito lost majority control in the Fischer case, a significant blow to his once-dominant position within the court. The lack of detail about the circumstances surrounding this change fuels speculation about possible pressure exerted by Roberts.
* **Barrett’s Indecisiveness:** Justice Barrett is presented as a source of frustration for her conservative colleagues, displaying indecisiveness in conferences and ultimately siding with liberal justices on several key decisions. This demonstrates her ongoing adaptation to the court and her willingness to defy expected ideological alignments.
* **Jackson’s Political Savvy:** Justice Jackson, a recent appointee, comes across as a shrewd operator. She appears to use strategic maneuvering to shape the court’s decisions, as exemplified by her involvement in the Fischer case.
Blackman concludes by calling for Chief Justice Roberts’ resignation. He argues that Roberts’s leadership has failed to maintain the integrity of the court, and that he has lost the respect of his colleagues.
This new reporting underscores the significant political turmoil brewing within the Supreme Court, raising questions about the institution’s ability to uphold its principles of impartiality and independence.
First Piper 